Delivery & Return:Free shipping on all orders over $50
Estimated Delivery:7-15 days international
People:21 people viewing this product right now!
Easy Returns:Enjoy hassle-free returns within 30 days!
Payment:Secure checkout
SKU:21119442
On November 22, 1963, three great men died within a few hours of each other: C. S. Lewis, John F. Kennedy and Aldous Huxley. All three believed, in different ways, that death is not the end of human life. Suppose they were right, and suppose they met after death. How might the conversation go? Peter Kreeft imagines their discussion as a part of The Great Conversation that has been going on for centuries. Does human life have meaning? Is it possible to know about life after death? What if one could prove that Jesus was God? With Kennedy taking the role of a modern humanist, Lewis representing Christian theism and Huxley advocating Eastern pantheism, the dialogue is lively and informative. This new edition of this classic work includes a postscript in which Kreeft describes why and how he wrote what has remained a standard of apologetic literature for a generation. He also adds an outline and index to the book as well as a never-before-published dialog in which he imagines "A World Without an Easter." Now more than ever this book offers an animated interaction that involves not only good thinking but good drama.
The Overview:This is one of a recent slew of books that deal with hypothetical conversations between great people, such as Ravi Zacharias's "Lotus and the Cross" which is a conversation between Jesus and Buddha, or Truman Madsen's "Five Classics" which has a hypothetical conversation between Joseph Smith and a mother with a blind baby. They provide a vehicle for translating the philosophy into practical reality of day-to-day life and pain.Of course the godfather of all these dialogues is Plato. The power and charm of this method of presentation is that it takes what is oftentimes an ethereal philosophical concept and translates it to realistic situations, such as the price of tomatoes or why I am hurting.The Idea:Due to an odd coincidence, President John F. Kennedy, Dr. C. S. Lewis, and Aldous Huxley died on the same day: 22 November 1963. Dr. Kreeft imagines what happens in the afterlife as these three men meet and interact. In a Socratic sense, Kreeft uses these three men to elaborate the three types of Christianity present today: Lewis and the traditional Christianity; Kennedy and the modern Christianity; and Huxley and the mystical Christianity.The real question behind all of the words and wrangling is the divinity of Christ. When that doctrine goes, everything else uniquely Christian soon falls, so the afterlife discussion is of capital importance for Christians. We allow people the freedom to believe whatever they want to believe, but there is commitment to the truth along with the commitment to good feelings and respect for other people.The main thrust of the book is to show by logic that Christ was in fact divine. These arguments are great apologetic scaffolding prior to gaining a personal witness. We sometimes get caught up in the idea that religion is solely and affair of the heart, but this book reminds us that God also gave us a brain, and that has a bearing on how and what we worship.By the way, Gov. Jesse Ventura once remarked "Organized religion is a sham and a crutch for weak-minded people who need strength in numbers." I wonder how well and how long the Hon. Gov.Ventura would stand in a debate with Dr. Peter Kreeft?The Book:The prose is an easy read. Peter Kreeft is one of these rare people who combine laser logic with righteous wit! That is what makes this book not only challenging but enchanting.The text is formatted like a script or play, so it is easy to keep track of who is talking and you can keep the characters and ideas straight. I guess if he wanted to, this book could make a frictionless transition to TV or VHS. The story is presented in one long act, with ample sidebar summaries to help you keep the arguments ordered, although I wonder if it would have been better to divide the text into scenes or acts to help punctuated the discussion.The cover-art is classic, and I hope they keep the same picture on every edition--it helps to see these three great men together as we weigh their ideas and viewpoints.My religion (Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints) does not have a strong apologetics tradition per se: we say, "If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God" (James 1:5), and be honest with the answer you get to your prayer. So it was fascinating to read the book and understand the sophisticated logic behind what Kreeft another others believe, the logical reason why he believes in the divinity of Christ.